Last updated · Reviewed by the Link Removal from Search team
We delete defamatory articles, copyright-infringing pages, doxxing URLs and outdated court records from Google for clients We remove fake and defamatory reviews for businesses in your country by documenting the policy or legal breach, so genuine ratings recover. — every route covered.
If you’re dealing with unwanted content appearing in search results, you’re not alone. Our specialist team handles hundreds of cases each year, helping individuals and businesses achieve a cleaner online presence.
Every case is different. The right approach depends on what type of content is involved, where it’s hosted, and what outcome you need. We start every engagement with a thorough assessment before recommending any action.
From direct removal requests to legal notices, Google delisting, and strategic suppression, we apply the most effective tools available. Our team has specialist knowledge of both UK law and the technical workings of search engines.
The sooner you act on a reputation problem, the more options you have. Contact us for a free, confidential assessment of your situation and honest advice on what’s achievable.
Before a client signs, an investor wires the funds, a partner introduces you, a date opens an app — they Google you first. A single defamatory article, leaked document, fake review or outdated court record can close doors you never even knew were open. Link Removal From Search exists to delete those URLs permanently from Google and every connected surface.
We remove URLs two ways: completely deleting the page at the source (publisher, host, platform takedown), then delisting it from Google Search, Images, AI Overviews and every connected surface. Both layers, one flat fee.
Libel, slander, false accusations, fabricated news articles and malicious blog posts removed under defamation and tort law worldwide.
Stolen images, leaked documents, pirated videos, plagiarised articles and any unauthorised reproduction of your owned work.
Home addresses, phone numbers, ID documents, banking details, medical records and other PII under Google’s “Results about you” policy.
Leaked addresses, family information, daily routine maps and any data weaponised to threaten you or your household.
One-star bombing campaigns, competitor sabotage, false complaints and unverifiable negative ratings on Google, Trustpilot, Yelp and beyond.
Old news articles, expunged or sealed court records, dismissed charges and outdated press that no longer reflect reality.
Fake websites impersonating your brand, scam pages, fraudulent profiles and cloned accounts directing traffic to fraud.
Right-to-be-forgotten delisting requests under GDPR Article 17, UK DPA, LGPD, CCPA, Indian DPDP Act and equivalent frameworks.
A clear, four-step process. You stay informed at every stage. We do the technical work, the legal correspondence and the platform escalation.
Share the Google search result hurting you. We accept screenshots, search-result links and direct URLs. WhatsApp or the form above — both arrive in the same inbox.
Within 24 hours we identify the strongest removal route — DMCA, defamation, GDPR, platform policy — and send a clear, flat-fee quote with timeline.
We submit every required notice to host, platform and Google directly. If the host refuses, we escalate to upstream networks, registrars, payment processors and counsel.
You receive a complete removal report showing the source URL gone (404 / dead-host proof) and the Google SERP cleared. We monitor for 12 months and re-file instantly if the URL or any near-duplicate resurfaces anywhere online.
The right route depends on the URL’s content, your jurisdiction, and the platform hosting it. We assess every case for the strongest available angle.
Google’s legal-removal channels are jurisdiction-aware — we file under the strongest applicable framework for each client’s country.
Link Removal From Search does not simply hide a result. We remove the original post, video, article or page from the platform where it lives. Once the source is gone, it disappears from Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo — and from AI answers in ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Grok and Google AI Overviews, because there is no longer a source for them to cite.
Where deletion is not possible, we pursue de-indexing, content updates or corrections at the source — updated sources are re-crawled quickly, which is what keeps AI search results clean and current.
We remove fake and defamatory reviews for businesses in United States by documenting the policy or legal breach, so genuine ratings recover. Every route is grounded in US state defamation law, the DMCA and the CCPA, and we remove content at its source so it also disappears from AI answers such as ChatGPT and Gemini.
Pick the problem you face or the country you need help in. Every page covers complete URL removal at the source plus Google delisting.
Send us the harmful URL. We’ll come back with a clear plan, the legal route, and a flat-fee quote — usually within 24 hours.
Jurisdiction-specific data protection, defamation law, and removal process information for United States. Last reviewed 2025.
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at federal level; California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) for California; state attorneys general in states with privacy laws is the supervisory authority for data protection in United States. Individuals can file erasure and data-related complaints directly with this authority.
No single federal privacy law. Key laws: California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA); Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA); Colorado Privacy Act (CPA); Connecticut Data Privacy Act; and 15+ additional state laws
The US has no federal right to erasure. California's CCPA/CPRA, Virginia's VCDPA, Colorado's CPA, and other state laws provide deletion rights to residents of those states. California's law is the most comprehensive â covering businesses meeting revenue or data processing thresholds that handle California residents' data.
US defamation law is primarily state law, but the First Amendment provides the world's strongest press freedom protections. Public figures must prove "actual malice" (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard) â the New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) standard. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides broad immunity to online platforms for third-party user content.
Content removal in the US relies on: (1) DMCA takedown notices for copyright infringement; (2) Platform terms-of-service violation reports; (3) State-specific privacy deletion requests (especially California CCPA); (4) Court injunctions (harder to obtain due to First Amendment). Section 230 makes direct legal action against platforms exceptionally difficult.
Common US sources requiring removal include local news sites across all 50 states, mugshot removal sites, Yelp, Google Reviews, Glassdoor, Ripoff Report, and data broker sites such as BeenVerified, Spokeo, and Whitepages.
Section 230 of the CDA is the defining feature of US content removal law â it immunises platforms from liability for third-party content, making court-ordered removal from US-based platforms exceptionally difficult compared to any other country. DMCA notices and state privacy law deletion requests (especially California CCPA) are typically far more effective routes.