We have been removing harmful content from the internet since 2001. We get material deleted at its source and cleared from Google, Bing and AI answers — for people who have usually already tried the free routes and been turned down. One flat fee, payable only once the content is gone, and we tell you before you commit if we think your case will fail.
Most people arrive believing there is one job to be done. There are two, and the difference decides whether the problem is solved or merely postponed.
A great deal of what is sold as “removal” in this industry is only ever the second one. If a provider does not draw this distinction for you, ask them which of the two they are actually doing.
You send the link and a short description. We identify which removal ground genuinely applies — copyright, privacy, defamation, impersonation, harassment, data protection — and whether it is likely to succeed. This is where we tell you if the answer is no, or if you can do it yourself for nothing.
One flat fee for the case, agreed in writing. No hourly billing, no scope creep, no charges added later. You approve the plan and the price before we act.
We pursue the host, the platform and, where they ignore well-founded complaints, the hosting provider’s abuse desk — the step most attempts stop short of. In parallel we deal with the search side: web results, image results, cached copies and AI answers each need clearing separately.
Invoiced on results. If we do not achieve removal within the agreed window, you owe nothing. We then watch for the content reappearing, because mirrors and reuploads are the most common reason a “finished” case comes back.
Content removal has a genuine scam problem, and the firms causing it share a habit: they promise that anything can be removed. We would rather be the ones who tell you the truth and lose the job.
Almost everyone who contacts us has already tried the obvious route and been refused. That is the normal starting point, not a sign your case is hopeless — most failed attempts were simply filed under the wrong ground.
Most of what we deal with is material people have not told their family about. That shapes how we work.
Every other page in this industry leads with quotes and logos. Ours does not, and that is a choice rather than an oversight — so it is worth explaining, because we know how it can look.
Our office is on Upper Bank Street, London, and we have been doing this work since 2001 — through the arrival of the right to be forgotten, the rise of people-search sites, and now synthetic media. Removal filings are decided by platform and search-engine teams rather than by anyone local, so where we sit does not affect the outcome. The law that governs your case very much does.
Being in the UK means we work daily with UK GDPR and the right to be forgotten, which are among the strongest content-removal rights available anywhere and are routinely overlooked by providers based outside them. Clients in the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Asia are handled under whichever framework actually applies to their situation — see the UK position and how it differs in the United States.
The assessment is free, there is no obligation, and we reply within 24 hours. If your case is one you can resolve yourself through a free tool, we will point you at the right form instead of quoting you for it.
Email: team@linkremovalfromsearch.com · Phone or WhatsApp: +44 7914 919573
Office: Upper Bank Street, London, United Kingdom
Read the detail before you get in touch: our full FAQ covers costs, timelines, what cannot be removed and how to tell a legitimate provider from a scam. All removal services · what it costs · how long it takes · our blog